Short answers win RFQs. Make every one of them count.
No room for waffle — and no room for a missed requirement. TenderTools keeps every answer on the question, inside the limits and free of gaps.
Where an RFQ carries a quality questionnaire, every sentence is weighed sharply. TenderTools extracts the requirements and limits from the pack, helps you answer short and specific, reuses what already worked — and warns you before a gap costs you points.
Free for 30 days. No credit card.
What does a strong RFQ response need?
Short documents, sharp scoring. TenderTools keeps the routine work out of the way so your time goes to the answers that decide.
Exactly the question
Requirements, format rules and the scoring scale come out of the pack first, so every answer lands on what is asked — and nowhere else.
Inside the limits
An editor on A4 with a live word and page counter. Over the limit? One click shortens, without losing the commitment.
What already worked
Earlier responses, case studies and company information sit next to the question as input — in your house style and tone of voice.
How TenderTools helps you win an RFQ
Four steps, one workspace. You set the order and adjust as you go — nothing changes without you seeing it.
Upload
The RFQ pack — PDF, Word or scans. Requirements, limits, deadlines and the scoring scale are extracted into the project.
Analyse
Five analyses feed the approach: documents, contracting authority, competitors, the market and your own company's winning themes.
Write
Short, specific answers with expert buttons and your library as evidence. Shorten, split or align with the wording — one click each.
Review
Requirements and format are checked as you write, with a warning when an answer risks being marked "poor or not answered". Expected score per criterion included.
Never lose points to a gap.
In a short process, one missed requirement can end the whole entry. While you write, AI comments check requirements and format — and raise a warning when an answer risks being marked "poor or not answered" and could lead to exclusion. General findings start with what gains the most, and comments sit next to the text, down to word level. What you do with them is up to you.
- Requirement and format checks while you write
- Warnings for answers that risk exclusion
- Findings that start with what gains the most
- Comments you resolve, ignore or discuss — your call
What is in it today.
Word export of every criterion house style module and tone of voice per tender English and Dutch, on UK award methodology (MEAT, MAT under the Procurement Act 2023) and Dutch award methodology a library per organisation reviewers free.
Questions, answered.
Isn't this overkill for a short RFQ?
It is fastest exactly where answers repeat. The library, the expert buttons and the review do the routine work, so your time goes to the answers that decide. And you can use as much of it as you like — no tool is compulsory and every suggestion can be declined.
Can I turn an earlier answer into a new one?
The library offers passages from earlier responses next to the question, and you decide what stays. The answer itself is still written from this RFQ's documents — nothing reads like a copy-paste.
How is my material handled?
EU data centers, AES-256 encryption, GDPR compliant. Reviewers you invite read and comment free. More about datasecurity →